How to Submit a Renewal Request for Humanitarians AI

This video shows how a Humanitarians AI fellow can request a renewal that a busy reviewer can verify quickly. The method is a short Markdown report in your fellows folder, with each claim paired with its own evidence and gaps left visible.

3:51 video3 min readWatch on YouTube

A renewal request is only useful if the reviewer can check it quickly. This video, narrated by Liam in for Bear, explains how to ask for a Humanitarians AI fellowship renewal so that the reviewer can verify it in minutes instead of digging through folders. The short version: write a Markdown report in your own fellows folder showing completed work, actual weekly hours and a direct link to the evidence for every claim, then email the report link to hr@humanitarians.ai and bear@humanitarians.ai.

The trap of expecting the reviewer to reconstruct your work

Professor Bear is very busy and will not go hunting for evidence. A folder of files does not explain what you did, and writing a clear, verifiable report is part of the fellow's job. The video reframes the question. The useful one is not how to ask but what the reviewer can actually verify.

A vague request hands over the work

The example fellow has a folder full of material, but the renewal message says only "please extend, my work is on GitHub." The work may exist, yet the request has handed the reviewer the job of finding and explaining it.

The video follows one claim to its evidence. The fellow says they prepared an explainer about plug-in components. Opening the linked item shows a beat sheet, which is a script and production plan and not a finished film. There is no viewing link, so the report must say plainly that the video evidence is missing.

Hours need a record too

The same applies to hours. The example lists 20 hours for each of four weeks, and the video states these are fictional teaching data. A real fellow records actual dates, tasks and time, and connects that record to the work. A video cannot prove 20 hours by itself, and a monthly average can hide a short week.

Why more links do not help

Adding a playlist, a repository or another folder only spreads the search out. None of them tells the reviewer which result to inspect. The fix is to put the exact item beside the claim it supports. The video organizes the material around three questions: what did you finish, what hours are documented, and what evidence can be opened. Each claim gets its own destination, and a missing item, such as an unplayable video, stays visibly unresolved.

The executive summary

That arrangement is the executive summary: enough context to understand the work and enough evidence to check it. It includes:

  • your project and group
  • the current agreement and its end date
  • the requested dates
  • two or three results
  • the next deliverables

Save it as Markdown inside your own fellows folder before it goes out.

Sending the request

Email the report link to both addresses Monday to Wednesday during business hours, before your agreement expires. Renewals require approval, and agreements are not backdated. For OPT post-completion compliance, the video says to document 20 or more qualifying hours, but hours alone do not establish full compliance. Individual requirements go to your school's international office. The video is not legal or immigration advice.

Key takeaways

  • Write a short Markdown report in your own fellows folder rather than sending only a folder of files.
  • Show completed work, actual weekly hours and a direct evidence link for each claim.
  • Email the report link to both hr@humanitarians.ai and bear@humanitarians.ai.
  • Send it Monday to Wednesday, business hours, before the agreement expires.
  • Renewals require approval and agreements are not backdated.
  • More links do not fix a missing connection between a claim and its evidence.
  • Leave missing evidence visible instead of hiding it.
  • Documented hours alone do not establish OPT compliance.

Try it yourself

Paste this into Claude: "Review my fellowship renewal draft and evidence links. Identify claims with no direct support, missing weekly hours, and inaccessible videos. Suggest a concise Markdown report for my fellows folder. Do not invent hours, results, links, or approvals." Then open every link yourself, since Claude cannot confirm a link works for a human reviewer.

Chapters

  1. 0:00TL;DR 0:25 Why it matters 0:35 The real question 0:55 A vague request 1:09 Following a claim to evidence 1:25 Hours you can check 1:42 Why more links don't help 2:02 Three questions 2:22 The executive summary 2:39 Sending the request 3:07 Verdict 3:23 Your turn
Full transcript(auto-generated, with timestamps)

TL;DR 0:25 Why it matters 0:35 The real question 0:55 A vague request 1:09 Following a claim to evidence 1:25 Hours you can check 1:42 Why more links don't help 2:02 Three questions 2:22 The executive summary 2:39 Sending the request 3:07 Verdict 3:23 Your turn

[0:00]Hedge this is Liam in forbear. This film explains how to submit a humanitarian's AI renewal request. Write a short markdown report in your own fellows folder. Show completed work actual weekly hours and direct evidence links. Email the report link to both HR at humanitarians.aii and bear humanitarians.aii. The trap is expecting the reviewer to reconstruct your work. Why should you care? Professor Bear is very busy. He must be able to find the evidence easily and he will not go hunting for it. A folder full of files does not explain what you did. Writing a clear, verifiable report is part of your job as a fellow. How do I make my renewal request easy to verify? The original question focuses on the request. The useful question focuses on what the reviewer can actually verify. Two useful terms, markdown, plain text that GitHub displays with headings and links. Frictional log, a dated record of attempts, obstacles, decisions, and learning. Example fellow has a folder

Full of material yet the renewal message says only please extend my letter my work is on GitHub what can bear actually verify from that the work may exist but the request has handed him the job of finding and explaining it let's follow one claim I prepared an explainer about plug-in components open the specific beat sheet that establishes a script and production plan not a finished film now look for the playable video example fellow has no viewing link so the report must say that the video evidence is missing Now change the claim to hours. The example lists 20 hours for each of four weeks. Those figures are fictional teaching data. A real fellow records actual dates, tasks, and time and connects the record to work. A video cannot prove 20 hours, and a monthly average can conceal a short week. The tempting fix is adding more links, a playlist, a repository, another folder. Watch the search spread out. None of those tells Bear

Which result to inspect. Adding destinations does not repair the missing connection between a claim and its evidence, but the exact item beside the claim it supports. What if we arrange the same material around three questions? What did you finish? What hours are documented? What evidence can I open? The report gives each claim its own destination before the paths connect. Predict which row must stay unresolved when there is no playable video. Watch the scattered evidence move beside its claim while the missing video stays visibly unresolved. That arrangement is the executive summary. Enough context to understand the work and enough evidence to check it. Add your project and group. Current agreement, end date, requested dates, two or three results, and next deliverables. Save the request as markdown inside your own fellows folder. The report is your responsibility. Return to the original request. Email the markdown report link to both HR at humanitarians.i and Barrett humanitarians.i I before your agreement expires Monday to Wednesday during

Business hours. Renewals require approval. Agreements are not backdated. Bear can open the evidence without searching. Document 20 or more qualifying hours for postcomp completion OPT, but hours alone do not establish full compliance. Individual requirements go to your school's international office. Let's recap with claude. Markdown report in your own fellows folder. Actual weekly hours in your contribution. Direct videos, logs, and work evidence. Missing evidence stays visible. Professor Bear is very busy. The fellow writes the clear report. The reviewer should not have to hunt. Your turn. Paste this into Claude. Review my fellowship renewal draft and evidence links. Identify claims with no direct support, missing weekly hours, and inaccessible videos. Suggest a concise markdown report for my fellows folder. Do not invent hours, results, links, or approvals. Then open every link yourself. The useful answer identifies gaps. It does not manufacture a convincing history. Keep your own judgment in the loop. How to submit a renewal request for humanitarians AI at Nick Bear Brown.

More from Fellows

Humanitarians AI Lyrical Literacy Project