Color Never Hears the Music | Exploring AI, Perception & Sensory Experience | Tanmay Kulkarni

Tanmay Kulkarni explains a 2013 Berkeley study in which listeners in two countries matched orchestral music to colors. The video argues that color does not hear the music; both carry the same feeling, and it ends with a prediction exercise.

4:46 video4 min readWatch on YouTube

The video opens with two clips of the same flat landscape. In one, the music is quick and bright and the sky is yellow; in the other, the music is slow and low and the sky is blue-gray. Tanmay Kulkarni asks the viewer to pair each sky with a tune. Most people put the yellow sky with the quick tune, which raises a puzzle: nothing about a yellow sky sounds quick, so what is being matched?

The Berkeley experiment

The answer comes from a 2013 study by Stephen Palmer and colleagues at Berkeley. Listeners heard 18 orchestral pieces by Bach, Mozart, and Brahms, each 50 seconds long, spread across slow, medium, and fast tempos and across major and minor keys. About 97 people in the United States and Mexico took part. For each piece they picked the five colors from a set of 37 that fit best and the five that fit worst. In both countries, quick major music drew lighter, more saturated, yellower colors, while slow minor music drew darker, grayer, bluer ones.

Feelings as the middle step

The researchers also had people rate every piece and every color on feelings: happy to sad, strong to weak, and more. When the ratings of the music and the ratings of the colors it drew were compared, they lined up closely. The correlation was 0.97 for happy to sad and 0.96 for strong to weak, and across all four word pairs it ranged from 0.89 to 0.99. The idea that follows is that color does not hear the music. Both carry the same feeling, and the step in the middle is the rating, so the sound never has to touch the color. The video is careful about one limit: these are correlations, and the authors say a direct link is not ruled out.

Two worked examples from the paper

The video tests the idea on the paper's own examples. Bach's fast dance in F major is rated happy and strong, and the paper places saturated yellow and light yellow in that corner. Brahms' slow adagio in C minor is rated sad and weak, and it drew black, dark gray, and dark cyan.

How far the match travels

The video gives two reasons color might be ready to carry feeling. An essay the video draws on says babies sort colors into categories by about six months and name them by about eighteen, so sorting comes before words. As for reach, correlations between the United States and Mexico ran from 0.8 to 0.97 across the color measures. But those are two countries in the Americas, and the music was Western classical. The authors write that it is unclear for music built on other scales, and the essay notes that color symbols differ: white means purity in much of the West and mourning in many Eastern cultures. The video's advice is to take the finding as strong, not as a law.

Putting it to work in film

The same essay describes how editors set a rhythm of arousal with scene length: long, calm scenes against short, busy ones. Its rule of thumb is a calm scene of 7 to 12 seconds set against a busy one of 1 to 3 seconds, with cool colors paired to the calm strip and warm colors to the busy one. A separate test of pacing, by Angeline Lillard and Jennifer Peterson in 2011, had four-year-olds watch a fast cartoon, watch a slower one, or draw for 9 minutes. Right afterwards, the fast-cartoon group did worse on four tasks of self-control and planning. The video notes that this measured the immediate effect on one group and was about pacing, not color.

A prediction exercise

Fast music pulls toward yellow and minor pulls toward blue, so where does fast minor music land? The viewer is asked whether its color is lighter or darker than slow minor, and whether it is more or less saturated than fast major. The paper's chart for United States listeners shows fast minor drew colors lighter, more saturated, and yellower than slow minor, and less so than fast major. Tempo and mode each moved the colors on their own, and fast minor landed between.

Key takeaways

  • People in two countries matched quick major music to light, saturated, yellower colors and slow minor music to darker, grayer, bluer ones.
  • Ratings of music and colors on happy-sad and strong-weak lined up with correlations of 0.97 and 0.96.
  • The link is explained as shared feeling, not sound touching color.
  • The results are correlations, and a direct link is not ruled out.
  • The study used two Americas countries and Western classical music, so it may not hold for music built on other scales.
  • Color symbolism differs by culture, so treat the finding as strong but not a law.
  • Tempo and mode each shifted color choices independently, and fast minor landed between the poles.

Try it yourself

Pick a short piece of music, rate it yourself on happy to sad and strong to weak, and choose the colors you would expect to fit. Then pause and predict, as the video does, where a piece that is fast but minor would land, and check whether you guess between the poles or at one end.

Full transcript(auto-generated, with timestamps)

[0:00]Here are two clips of the same flat landscape. In one, the music is quick and bright. In the other, it's slow and low. One sky is yellow, the other blue-gray. Pick which sky goes with which music, and keep an eye on the strip at the bottom, which has two scales, happy to sad and strong to weak, because we'll need them. I'm Tanmay Kulkarni in for Humanitarian's AI. If you put the yellow sky on the quick tune, you picked the way most listeners do in two different countries. Here's the odd part, though. Nothing in a yellow sky sounds quick, so what are people actually matching? In 2013, Stephen Palmer and colleagues

[0:52]At Berkeley played 18 pieces of orchestral music by Bach, Mozart, and Brahms, 50 seconds each. Some were slow, some medium, some fast, and major and minor. About 97 people in the United States and in Mexico listened. For each piece, they picked the five colors that fit best from a set of 37, and the five that fit worst. In both countries, quick major music drew lighter, more saturated yellower colors. Slow minor music drew darker, grayer, bluer ones. Here's what they think is underneath. People also rated every piece and every color on feelings, happy, sad, strong, weak, and more. Rate the music, rate the colors it drew, and the two line up. .97

[1:28]For happy to sad, .96 for strong to weak. Across all four word pairs, .89 to .99. So, the idea is that color doesn't hear the music. Both carry the same feeling. One honest limit, these are correlations. The authors say so, and they say a direct link isn't ruled out. Run it with the paper's own two examples, Bach's fast dance in F major, rated happy strong. Which colors sit in that corner? The paper says saturated yellow and light yellow. Now, Brahms' slow adagio in C minor, sad, weak, black, dark, grey, dark, cyan. The step in the middle is the rating. The sound never has to touch the color.

[2:04]Why would color be ready to carry feeling at all? In an essay we read, babies sort colors into categories by about 6 months and name them by about 18. So, the sorting comes before the words. A color can mean something to you before you have a word for it. How far does the match travel? Between the United States and Mexico, very far. The correlations between the two countries ran from 0.8 to 0.97 across the color measures. But, those are two countries in the Americas and the music was Western classical. The authors write that it's unclear for music built on other scales. And the essay we read adds

[2:35]That color symbols differ. White for purity in much of the West, morning in many Eastern cultures. So, take it as strong, not as a law. Now, put that to work. The essay we read describes how editors set a rhythm of arousal with scene length. Long, calm scenes, short, busy ones. It's rule of thumb is a calm scene of 7 to 12 seconds set against a busy one of 1 to 3. Look at those two strips. Same length of film, very different pulse. It pairs the calm strip with cool colors and the busy one with warm. Pacing has been tested, too, on its own. In 2011, Angeline Lillard and Jennifer

[3:08]Peterson had 64-year-olds watch a fast cartoon, watch a slower one, or draw for 9 minutes. Right afterwards, the fast group did worse on four tasks of self-control and planning. That test was about pacing, not color. It measured the immediate effect and it was one group of four-year-olds. Here's a case where two things pull against each other. Fast music pulls toward yellow and minor pulls toward blue. The paper played every combination, so fast and minor is in the data. Use the strip fast as strong, minor as sad, so where does fast and minor land? Then answer two more questions about it. Is its color lighter or darker than slow minors? Is it more

[3:42]Or less saturated than fast majors? Pause here and write down both answers. Here's what the paper's chart shows. Read off its figure for the United States listeners. Fast minor music drew colors lighter, more saturated and yellower than slow minor, and less than fast major. Tempo and mode each moved the colors on their own, and fast minor landed between. If you guessed between, the method held. If you guessed one pole, that's where it needs more than two scales. So, here's the opening again, swapped. The quick tune under the blue-gray sky, the slow tune under the yellow one. It feels wrong, and now you know why. It

[4:24]Isn't that the colors can't hear. It's that each of them is carrying a feeling, and the feelings don't agree. I'm Taimur Khan Carney in for Humanitarian's AI. The study is Palmer's, and it all began with an essay we read.

More from Fellows

Humanitarians AI Lyrical Literacy Project