Claude, Supplier Selection.
This video opens the supplier-selection skill to show that Claude does not simply choose the cheapest supplier. A fixed 50-30-20 weighted score decides the pick, with set tie-breakers, though override notes in the file can change the result.
A natural guess is that Claude simply picks whichever supplier is cheapest and calls it done. The video says it does not. By opening a skill called supplier-selection, it shows that Claude scores every supplier with a weighted formula and that the winner is the highest score, not the lowest price.
What a skill is
A Claude skill is a folder Claude reads before it acts. This one has a single file inside it, SKILL.md, written in plain language with no hidden logic. That makes it possible to open the file and see exactly how the decision is made.
The wrong guess: lowest price wins
The assumption the video tests is that Claude ranks suppliers by price and picks the cheapest. Opening the file shows that price is only part of the story. The score weighs three factors together: price, lead time, and reliability.
The weights and the arithmetic
The weights are fixed at 50 percent for price, 30 percent for lead time, and 20 percent for reliability. The mechanism has three parts:
- Claude normalizes price and lead time onto the same zero-to-one scale.
- It multiplies each factor by its weight.
- It adds the results to get a score.
The highest score wins. If scores tie, the tie breaks on price first, then lead time, then name.
Repeatable results
Because the formula is fixed, feeding it the same quotes twice scores them identically each time. The video calls that repeatability real, and it is one of the things a written skill provides that an improvised judgment does not.
Override notes the formula never sees
The same SKILL.md also carries override notes that never show up in the catalog data. If one applies, it can beat the top score. So a pick is not simply the cheapest supplier, and it is not even purely the highest scorer: it is the highest score from a weighted formula, with the possibility that a note the formula never sees can still win out.
What the video does not claim
The video states that price still matters, since it carries the largest single weight at 50 percent, just not the whole formula. It does not judge whether supplier-selection is a well-built skill, and it does not invent supplier names, prices, or a particular override. It reports only that the weights are fixed and that override notes exist outside the catalog data and can change the pick.
Key takeaways
- Claude does not just pick the cheapest supplier; it scores each one.
- The skill is a folder containing one plain-language file, SKILL.md.
- The score weights price at 50 percent, lead time at 30 percent, and reliability at 20 percent.
- Price and lead time are normalized to a common zero-to-one scale before weighting.
- The highest score wins, and ties break on price, then lead time, then name.
- The same quotes always produce the same scores.
- Override notes in SKILL.md can beat the top score, and they do not appear in the catalog data.
Try it yourself
Take a short scoring formula you already use, such as a rubric or any rule with weighted factors, and hand it to Claude. Before it computes anything, ask it to tell you each factor's weight and how it would combine them. Doing this before any numbers are run shows whether Claude understands the formula the way the file states it. Use your own formula rather than the video's supplier example.
Chapters
- 0:00The naive framing: "Claude just picks the cheapest"
- 0:10The folder, one file: supplier-selection/SKILL.md
- 0:21The wrong guess: lowest price wins?
- 0:31The anchor: the weighted score, three factors
- 0:44The mechanism: normalize, weight, sum
- 0:58The anchor returns: same weights, an override can flip it
- 1:15Carry-out
- 1:23Your turn
Full transcript(auto-generated, with timestamps)
The naive framing: "Claude just picks the cheapest"
[0:00]You guess Claude just picks whichever supplier is cheapest and calls it done. It doesn't. It scores every supplier on a weighted formula. So, it's actually deciding the winning score.
The folder, one file: supplier-selection/SKILL.md
[0:10]A Claude skill is a folder Claude reads before it acts. This one is called supplier selection. Open it up and there's one file inside, skill. MD, plain language, no hidden logic. The
The wrong guess: lowest price wins?
[0:21]Natural guess is that Claude just ranks suppliers by price and picks whoever's cheapest. Quote, "Low, win the order." Open skill.md and price is only part of the story. The score weighs price, lead
The anchor: the weighted score, three factors
[0:32]Time, and reliability together. 50%, 30%, 20%. Claude normalizes price and lead time onto the same zero to one scale, multiplies each factor by its weight, and adds them up. Highest score
The mechanism: normalize, weight, sum
[0:44]Wins. Ties break on price, then lead time, then name. Feed it the same quotes twice and the formula scores them identically every time. That repeatability is real. But, skill. MD also carries override notes that
The anchor returns: same weights, an override can flip it
[0:58]Never show up in the catalog data. And if one applies, it can beat the top score. A Claude skill's pick isn't the cheapest supplier. It's the highest score from a weighted formula. And a note the formula never sees can still beat it. Your turn. Paste this into Claude. I'm going to hand you a short scoring formula with a few weighted
Carry-out
[1:16]Factors in it. Before you compute anything, tell me each factor's weight and how you combine them before you run the numbers. Claude supplier selection,
Your turn
[1:24]Liam Inferbear.





