Bear Browns Prompt Writing Tips
Prompt engineering framed as a writing craft, built around three reusable patterns and the discipline of showing rather than telling.
Most advice on writing prompts treats it like filling out a form: be specific, give context, state your goal. This piece takes a different angle entirely, treating prompt writing as a literary act with its own craft, closer to Hemingway or Woolf than to a technical checklist. The core claim is simple: a computer needs clarity the same way a reader does, and the clearer the prompt, the better the reply.
Think of yourself as a writer
The starting premise is that you already have the skills this requires. You read, you know what makes prose land, you know the difference between telling someone something and showing them. Prompt writing asks you to apply that same instinct to a different kind of reader: the computer on the other end of the exchange. That reader is not human, but it responds to the same qualities good writing has always rewarded, clarity, structure, and intent, dressed up here as "a dance of language between human and AI."
Show, don't tell
The piece leans hard on this classic writing principle. Rather than telling a model what you want in abstract terms, you show it: give an example, model the pattern you're after, and let the model extend it. This connects directly to iteration. You draft a prompt, test what comes back, and refine it, the same way a writer revises a line until it says exactly what they meant.
Three patterns worth knowing
The piece names three concrete prompt patterns, each a different tool for a different job:
The persona pattern. You assign the model a role directly: "you are an expert." This sets expectations for tone, vocabulary, and depth before the actual request even arrives.
The template pattern. You give the model an explicit structure to fill: first X, then Y, conclude with Z. This is useful when you need a predictable shape in the output rather than an open-ended response.
The alternatives pattern. You ask the model to consider multiple angles rather than commit to a single answer immediately, three angles to review, for instance. This is the pattern to reach for when you want breadth before you narrow down to one direction.
Each pattern is a tool, and each prompt built with one is a chance to get a better result than a vague, unstructured request would produce.
Identify the goal first
Before choosing a pattern, the piece insists on a prior step: know what response you're actually trying to get. What are you seeking? That question has to be answered before you can pick the right framework, because the persona, template, and alternatives patterns solve different problems, and choosing blindly wastes the advantage any of them offers.
Test, refine, and treat it as a draft
Nothing here is presented as one-shot. The advice is to test a prompt, then refine it, line by line, the way an editor revises a manuscript. That means debugging your approach the same way you would debug a written piece that isn't landing: figure out where the response missed what you meant, and adjust the prompt rather than assuming the model is simply wrong.
Key takeaways
- Treat prompt writing as a form of writing craft, not just instruction-giving; clarity and structure carry the same weight they do in prose.
- The persona pattern assigns the model a role and expertise level before you state the request.
- The template pattern gives the model an explicit structure: first X, then Y, conclude Z.
- The alternatives pattern asks for multiple angles instead of a single answer, useful when you want breadth before narrowing down.
- Show the model examples rather than only describing what you want; let the example do the teaching.
- Identify your goal before choosing a pattern, and treat every prompt as a draft to test and refine.
Try it yourself
Pick a task you regularly hand to an AI tool, and rewrite your usual prompt using one of the three patterns above: assign a persona, build a template, or ask for alternatives. This piece comes from Studio Sessions with Bear and Humanitarians AI, and it's aimed at anyone who writes prompts often enough that a little more craft would actually pay off.
Full transcript(auto-generated, with timestamps)
[0:00]Think of yourself as a writer like Hemingway, Wolf, Austin, Baldwin, or Joyce. Think of yourself as a writer. Know you read her well. A computer needs clarity for your thoughts to tell. The clearer your prompt, the better it will reply. A dance of language between human and AI. Show just not tell. Your intentions won't lie. Like Hemingway's brevity, Wolf's inner sight. Austin's Whitten Baldwin's truth shining bright. Programming with language, art with science aligned. Your prompts are the code. Your thoughts redesign. Think of yourself as a writer speaking to code. Your audience is a computer on this digital road. First identify your goal. What response do you
[1:11]Seek? Choose the right pattern. The framework technique, the persona pattern. You are an expert. Defined the template pattern. First X then Y. Conclude Z aligned. Alternative approaches. Consider three angles to review. Each pattern a tool, each prompt a breakthrough. Think of yourself as a writer. Know your reader. Well, a computer needs clarity for your thoughts to tell. The clearer your prompt, the better it will reply. A dance of language between human and AI. Show just not tell. Your intentions won't lie. Craft your prompt with examples like Joyce with stream of thought. Show. Don't just tell, let patterns be taught. Test and refine like Elliot, revising
[2:00]Each line. Debug your approach. Let excellence shine. Remember, you're writing for a unique kind of mind. Not human yet. Language attuned and designed. The clearer you speak, the better it hears. Like to precision cutting through years. Identify your goal. What response to elicit? Choose the pattern. Find frameworks that fit it. Craft your prompt. Let examples guide your vision. Test and refine. Seek clarity and precision. Think of yourself as a writer who knows their reader well. In this case, a computer that needs clarity to excel. The better you prompt, the better the reply. A dance of language between human and AI.
More videos
2:08Bridging the Pixel Gap in Browser Automation.
2:23How One Narrow Safety Rule Can Make an AI Less Safe Everywhere Else.
2:04Why splitting a chunk from its document makes it retrieve for the wrong question
4:20Three You Can Take Back. One You Can't.
2:21Why a 50-turn agent pays for the same screenshot 35 times unless it caches the pixels
1:53